Budget 2013 – something’s always wrong

I have really got no beef with this year’s budget. It’s proceeding (more or less) in the direction that the country needs to go. It’s got more a progressive taxation structure without having to mess with either income tax, corporate tax or GST. It has bigger benefits for the needy and higher costs for the rich. It’s starting to put the squeeze on cheap labour and encouraging businesses to pay fair value for workers, especially Singaporeans. Preschool education gets a massive boost. I’m not so cynical to think that the government is just throwing money at us to buy our loyalty. It’s not an election year anyway.

Still, some weaknesses do exist: a nagging question of whether GST vouchers are just a stop-gap drug for painful inflation numbers, or a badly disguised attempt at buying votes. The definition of a “low income” Singaporean ranging from income to per-capita income to assessable income to type of dwelling to AV of dwelling doesn’t seem to give a clear picture of income inequality. How big of a dent in our Gini are the new handouts going to make? Do any of these measures actually directly address our income gap problem (I don’t think they will)? What about a budget measure to build our fast-crumbling national cohesion/national identity?

And I don’t mean a bigger NDP.

That last point, I believe is the biggest weakness of this year’s budget – not so much a weakness of the budget itself, but of our nation. With each passing year, we fragment a little more. With every budget handout it seems that we think a little more about ourselves, and let the government take care of the poor.

A number of friends quipped before the live stream of the budget speech, “Let me know if we get any ang pows!” Indeed, even Channel NewsAsia ran an infographic on their Facebook page asking the public “What’s in it for you?” Our annual budget seems to have become more about what individuals and individual companies can get out of Singapore than a fiscal plan that points the nation in the direction that it needs to go. The budget has become just a matter of dollars, not a signal of values, which it should also be.

Will companies make sacrifices to raise low-income earners’ wages? Will Singaporeans give less to charitable causes now that we sense the government is stepping up its welfare schemes? Will the rich see progressive taxation as an infringement on their wealth and try to exert more influence on policy? Will MNCs keep threatening to abandon their bases here if costs must rise so that justice can be done?

I think the biggest problem with this year’s budget is us.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Budget 2013 – something’s always wrong

  1. Call me cynical, but I think we have been the problem from the beginning, not just for this budget. After all, we voted in this government.

    I agree that the budget addressed most of the pressing issues and they were clever to balance increased labour cost with decrease in operation costs.

    However, instead of increasing foreign work levies, I would rather they impose minimum wage structures for foreign workers, so that they will be able to cope with rising costs in Singapore. Or maybe also force employers to invest more in basic amenities for their workers.

    • Thanks for your comment! I guess to say that “we voted in this government” would be technically correct, but it seems that it’s more a case of “we haven’t voted out this government”. 🙂

      Our current government is allergic to minimum wages. Nevermind that there are perfectly workable ways to implement a minimum wage, out government still chooses to use some legislation that can’t guarantee wage rises (although it may encourage it). From what some friends at NTUC tell me, the real thing that is happening (and too slowly) is that the G is putting a non-legislative squeeze on companies to raise wages for now. If this doesn’t work (in, say, a few years), they may turn to legislation.

      I can already think of a few ways that companies can totally continue to exploit workers by using the Wage Credit Scheme, but i’ll keep it to my self until the exact details of the WCS are announced.

  2. Daily SG: 27 Feb 2013 | The Singapore Daily

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s